Bid Protest, Favoritism Charges Cloud Lee/Beach Project

Originally published in 2014. Since repeated.

by Charlie Whitehead


Bid Protest, Favoritism Charges Cloud Lee/Beach Project
So how does a firm angling to run a $50 million county project go from rated dead last among those seeking the work to walking away with the contract?
That’s what officials with Wright Construction want to know.
A cloud hangs over a major project at Fort Myers Beach as Wright claims Lee County officials steered a construction management contract worth millions to a favorite.
The project would re-build Estero Boulevard, the main drag in the county’s tourism lifeblood barrier island town of Fort Myers Beach. It’s a $50 million road and utility project, to be funded in increments every two years over the next decade.
It will include utility work approved in a referendum by Beach voters in 2007 when current Commissioner Larry Kiker was the town’s mayor.
The project itself faces enough hurdles without the bid protest. Numerous Beach businesses have encroached with parking and even building into public right-of-way needed for the project. When Beach voters approved a referendum to pay to fix the leaky run-down water system the town bought from Florida Cities Water Company in 2001 early estimates were it could cost as much as $18 million to fix, well above the $7.5 million included in the county project.
Both county and town officials described the project as a high-profile lightning rod sure to create controversy. Estero Boulevard routinely becomes a 6-mile parking lot during the busy winter and spring season, a situation sure to be made worse by construction.
Even the county’s own project newsletters admit the project is not designed to ease seasonal vehicular traffic congestion, describing it instead as a means to allow travelers to shift to bicycles, walking and trolleys.
In a bid protest hearing on October 28 attorney Trent Cotney argued the pending award of a construction management contract for the widening of Estero Boulevard to Chris-Tel Construction was a predetermined conclusion.
Cotney claims Assistant County Manager Doug Meurer influenced the 3-person county short-list and selection committee to select the firm that the committee initially ranked last among the six seeking the work.
Meurer did not attend the hearing and will not comment on the pending bid protest. The selection committee was comprised of three men who are his subordinates. He is heard on the tape of first the short-list meeting and then the selection meeting pushing for Chris-Tel.
At the bid protest hearing three other county higher-ups, one of Meurer’s co-workers and two of his subordinates, backed him up. That, according to Cotney, is no surprise.
Cotney said that simply listening to the tapes of the two committee meetings it clear to him.
“Any reasonable person would conclude the selection of Chris-Tel was a foregone conclusion,” Cotney said.
Berk Edwards, attorney for Chris-Tel, said if that’s true the whole process was corrupt.
“If it’s a foregone conclusion then people are pre-decided,” he said. “On the take is a harsh way to say it, but that’s what foregone conclusion means,” he said.
But Cotney pointed to the initial committee rankings. Two of the three committee members selected Wright first and one picked them second. All three picked Chris-Tel last.
“Chris-Tel was in last place, and they were in last place for a reason,” he said.
In fact the short-list committee was expected to ‘keep’ only three firms. Meuer urged them to add Chris-Tel to the list, citing his ‘experience and knowledge of personnel’.
“I’m going to maybe try to influence who we talk to,” he said. “I’d like to add a fourth interview: Chris-Tel.”
The short-list committee – Transportation director Dave Loveland, transportation project manager Rob Phelan and utilities project manager Luis Molina, all three Meurer’s subordinates – agreed. They kept five of the six instead, discarding only the one firm with no local office.
But Edwards said once Chris-Tel was on the short list they started afresh, on the same footing as the others. He compared it to getting a ‘B’ on a midterm and then acing the final. He noted town officials at the selection committee meeting said they’d been ‘blown away’ by Chris-Tel’s presentation.
“The fact that Chris-Tel blew them away is not favoritism,” he said. “Wright is essentially saying that from the inception everybody was on the take.”
This is not the first time Wheeler and Chris-Tel have found themselves in the teeth of a county contract controversy. In 2008 his romantic relationship with then-Commissioner Tammy Hall had Commissioners Frank Mann and Brian Bigelow questioning the county process. Both men specifically criticized it for creating selection and short-list committees of county bosses and underlings.
The process, they said, is rife with opportunities for favoritism and undue influence. That is precisely what Wright alleges.
Back then the focus was the contract to build the new Red Sox stadium. Chris-Tel was identified by main contractor Manhattan-Kraft Construction as a sub, and Hall obtained a staff ethics opinion that she must cast her vote. Kraft got the contract with Chris-Tel as a sub. Chris-Tel has since hired away two Kraft employees, cited by Meurer as a reason to favor Chris-Tel.
Hall is gone, tossed from office when she was caught stealing more than $30,000 from her 2010 campaign account. Bigelow is gone too, resigning to run unsuccessfully for another office in 2012 before cocaine charges in 2012 and 2013 derailed his public career.
Mann is still in office.
Wright has made public records requests for internal emails and other communications between county officials as well as county commissioner election finance reports. Chris-Tel president Howard Wheeler is active in local politics and wrote checks to the campaigns of all five current county commissioners.
Wright’s records request had not been filled when the protest hearing took place. Cotney said people are reviewing the extensive information received since.
Unsurprised by the protest committee decision, Cotney said the case will go before county commissioners. If they go along with the recommendation the next option is court.
“It was pretty clear they had an agenda,” he said of the selection system. “They missed the mark on fairness from the very beginning.”


  1. Debbie Sullivan Whitehead


Leave a Reply to Pam Oakes Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s